10-22-09, 02:37 PM | |
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Colorado
|
This is just my opinion, but I would suggest getting B&G and not worrying about the Gymstyles.
There's not *that* great a difference between Pure Strength and the Gymstyles, but for the type of program (heav(ier), low(er) rep), the Pure Strength series just seems to me to be a better thought out program. The Gymstyles (esp. the UB ones) suffer from overkill, IMO -- too may sets of too many exercises, especially for the smaller muscle groups. B&G, on the other hand, is sufficiently different from Muscle Max to warrant getting B&G. B&G is exclusively lower body focused, whereas MM has, what, two LB sets of two exercises each, right? There are some interesting, different moves in B&G as well, and you get two separate 15-minute ab routines besides. Plus, B& never fails to leave my LB sore for at least a day or two afterward! HTH!
__________________
http://members.aol.com/naconfer/images/hazel_hobbes.gif What would you attempt to do if you knew you could not fail? |
10-23-09, 09:58 PM | |
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SoCal
|
no.... the add-on/bonus stability ball abs workout has horrid music!
__________________
----- evil enabler! ----- it is NOT against the rules to say DIET on this forum! ----- "VFers have a right to post negative opinions about an instructor, and there is not a limit on the number of times they do so". - WWWendy ----- "...no matter how unpopular you perceive your opinion to be, we guarantee you are not the only one here who holds that opinion, and you should feel free to express it." - WWWendy via forum guidelines |
Tags |
cathe, cathe friedrich |
|
|